Нажмите Enter, чтобы посмотреть результаты, или нажмите Esc для отмены.

Офицеры о причинах отказов: цитаты из CAIPS/GCMS

Ниже мы приводим произвольную выборку заметок иммиграционных офицеров из реальных визовых файлов — заявлений на временные визы (включая также разрешения на работу и учёбу в Канаде).

Ни одно из этих заявлений не было подготовлено специалистами Lawpoint. Все эти заявления получили отказ. Судите сами, насколько разнообразными могут быть мотивы и причины отказов, и сколько всего нужно учесть при подготовке подобных заявлений.

Если вы получили отказ, подав заявление на временную визу, разрешение на работу или учёбу, или на иммиграцию в Канаду, вы можете получить ваш визовый файл через www.visafile.info. В нём вы найдёте детальную мотивацию отказа наподобие тех, что приведены ниже.

Income comes from more than one source. Limited travel history to schengen states. not satisfied genuine visitor, not satisfied would abide by the terms and conditions of trv.

Один из самых распространенных сценариев: недостаточная история поездок, неочевидные источники средств.

Employment history and income not in-line with previous applications. Not satisfied with purpose of trip or ties.

Нестыковки с предыдущими заявлениями.

No proof of savings for hosts. No proof of savings for applicant. LICO does not appear met even if daughter and son-in-law have no children. Applicant has an average/low income and in the lack of evidence of savings I am not satisfied that adequate funds are available. Establishment for both applicant and hosts is not demonstrated either.

Отказ в первую очередь по финансовым основаниям.

наш телеграм-канал: Иммиграционный Адвокат
Insufficient documented proof with regard to alleged funds. I have reviewed all documentation on file and applicant has not satisfied me that he has adequate funds available to him to pay for his tuition and living expenses while in Canada and to return to his country of residence. I am not satisfied that applicant is a bona fide temporary resident who would leave Canada at the end of the period of authorised stay. Applicant does not meet the requirements for a study permit.

Кандидат не смог продемонстрировать, что располагает достаточными денежными средствами для оплаты обучения.

not satisfied that PA and spouse will return to Ukraine at the end of their authorised stay if visas issued to them; believe that the family might try to remain in Cda for good; not satisfied that they would do it properly

Ещё одна распространённая причина отказа: у офицера есть основания полагать, что кандидат не покинет Канаду в срок.

NO SATISFACTORY PROOF OF WORK EXPERIENCE. NO SATISFACTORY EVIDENCE OF ANY VOCATIONAL SKILL OR TRAINING RELATED TO PROPOSED JOB. NO SATISFACTORY PROOF OF EMPLOYMENT INCOME OR SOURCE OF PERSONAL SAVINGS. I AM NOT SATISFIED APPLICANT CAN PERFORM THE WORK SOUGHT IN CDA NOR THAT APPLICANT WOULD DEPART CANADA AT THE END OF THE PERIOD AUTHORIZED FOR STAY

Явно непроработанное заявление – отсутствуют документальные подтверждения едва ли не по всем существенным аспектам.

Employed as Deputy Director - no evidence of income provided. Subject appears to have a strong desire to reach Canada and his purpose changes from application to application. Now is a self registered participant in a conference. Not satisfied subject has a genuine business purpose or that is not an intending immigrant.

Офицер отмечает предыдущие попытки кандидата получить визу в Канаду под разными предлогами.

Applicant and his spouse and dtr are applying. PA is applying for WP based on an LMO for [employer name omitted]. I have searched the employment validation in GCMS that supports this application and have found that such a validation does exist, but applicana is not one of the 5 people listed on the LMO.The LMO is presented by his consultant as pertaining to him but it does not. A blatant case of misrep in order to inappropriately qualify for a WP. Inadmissible for A40(1)(a). Refused. Spouse and child as well because they alos sough to get a status document that they would not be entitled to. Also provisions of A40(2)(a) apply as well.

Попытка получить разрешение на работу на основании подложных документов. Ссылки на пункты законодательства означают двухлетний запрет на въезд в страну – всем членам семьи.

insufficient proof of previous IT studies or ESL studies. spouse is only recently employed. I am not satisfied that PA and spouse are well-established in Russia and that they will leave Canada at the end of their stay.

Семья не имеет достаточно сильных связей со страной постоянного проживания, и скорее всего попробует остаться в Канаде.

PA wants to pursue a course of study that is unrelated to her current studies. She has weak family ties to Russia and her family has submitted no proof of income. She is being supported by her mother's fiance. Considering there is no family relationship, I am concerned that there is a risk that money will not be provided to PA as promised if the relationship was to break down.

Нет убедительного обоснования выбора учебной программы. Происхождение и наличие средств для покрытия расходов на учебу тоже ставится под сомнение.

AFFIDAVIT OF SPOUSAL FINANCIAL SUSTAINANCE ON FILE. SPOUSE IS A CIVIL SERVANT. SALARY NOT KNOWN. REFUSAL RECOMMENDED. ACCOUNT PRESENTED LOOKS BOGUS. DOUBT CREDIBILITY OF FUNDS BASED ON PA'S INCOME. SOURCE OF FUNDS PRESENTED NOT KNOWN. DOUBT BONAFIDE AND INTENTIONS.

Мы обеспечиваем юридическую поддержку по всем вопросам,
связанным с иммиграцией и визами в Канаду

У офицера возникли сомнения в достоверности предоставленных документов.

has been nominated aat a community level but has to meet other criteria to apply under PN program. Criteria not disclosed. Subj has limited savings. Not satisfied would abide by the terms of trv if visa granted. Not satisfied economic ties are strong enough to warrant return

Отказ в ознакомительном визите для иммиграции по провинциальной программе – условия получения временных виз едины для всех кандидатов.

States business purpose but provided no invitaiton from Canada, no explanation form his employer. I am not satisfied reasons for visiting canada is valid.

Заявлен деловой визит без достаточного обоснования.

Low income, funds were recently deposited and bank statement does not show regular deposit of income, no compelling reason for travel I am not satisfied that PA is sufficiently established to ensure her departure at the end of auth. period of stay

Сомнительное происхождение денежных средств – зачислены на счёт незадолго до подачи заявления.

PA is 24 y.o., wishes to travel to Cda for tourism. Single, student, unemployed. Mother to sponsor trip. Prev travel to Shengen and USA. I am not satisfied that PA has sufficient professional, personal, or financial ties to country of residence to motivate departure from Cda at end of auth stay. Application refused.

Самый распространённый и самый общий случай. С такой формулировкой отказа работать при повторной подаче заявления труднее всего именно в силу её неконкретности.